We represent families across Arizona in wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases. Every case is prepared for trial from the beginning.
When a construction accident claims the life of a loved one in Tucson, families face devastating emotional and financial consequences. Arizona law allows surviving family members to pursue wrongful death claims against negligent parties responsible for the fatal accident, providing a legal pathway to compensation for lost income, funeral expenses, and the immeasurable loss of companionship. Under Arizona Revised Statutes § 12-612, families typically have two years from the date of death to file a wrongful death lawsuit, making prompt legal action essential to preserving your rights.
Construction sites present some of the most hazardous working environments in Tucson, with workers facing dangers from heavy machinery, falls from heights, electrical hazards, and collapsing structures daily. When safety protocols fail or negligence occurs, the results can be catastrophic. These tragedies extend beyond workplace accidents to include bystanders, motorists near construction zones, and visitors who may encounter unsafe conditions created by construction activity.
If you have lost a family member in a Tucson construction accident, Wrongful Death Trial Attorney LLC provides compassionate representation combined with aggressive advocacy to hold negligent parties accountable. Our dedicated legal team understands the complexity of construction accident wrongful death cases and fights to secure maximum compensation for your family during this difficult time. Contact us at (480) 420-0500 or complete our online form to schedule a free consultation and learn how we can help you pursue justice for your loved one.
Arizona wrongful death law provides specific protections for families who have lost loved ones due to negligent or wrongful acts. A wrongful death occurs when someone dies as the direct result of another party’s negligence, recklessness, or intentional misconduct. In construction accident cases, this often involves violations of workplace safety regulations, inadequate training, defective equipment, or failure to maintain safe working conditions.
The legal foundation for these claims rests on proving that the defendant’s actions or inactions directly caused the fatal accident. This requires establishing four essential elements: the defendant owed a duty of care to the deceased, the defendant breached that duty through negligent conduct, the breach directly caused the death, and the death resulted in measurable damages to surviving family members. Construction companies, property owners, equipment manufacturers, and subcontractors may all bear liability depending on their role in creating the hazardous condition that led to the fatality.
Arizona law designates specific individuals who have the legal standing to file wrongful death claims. Under A.R.S. § 12-612, only the deceased person’s personal representative can file the lawsuit, though they do so on behalf of qualifying beneficiaries including surviving spouses, children, parents of minor children, and in some cases other dependent family members who can demonstrate financial reliance on the deceased.
Construction sites involve inherently dangerous work, and when safety measures fail, the consequences can be deadly. Understanding the most common causes of fatal construction accidents helps families identify potentially liable parties and build stronger legal claims.
Falls from Heights – Falls from scaffolding, ladders, roofs, and elevated platforms cause more construction fatalities than any other hazard. These accidents often result from inadequate fall protection equipment, unstable scaffolding, missing guardrails, or failure to properly secure safety harnesses. Arizona construction sites must comply with OSHA fall protection standards requiring protective measures for work performed at heights of six feet or more.
Struck-By Accidents – Workers and bystanders can be struck by falling objects, swinging equipment, or moving vehicles on construction sites. Inadequate barriers, failure to secure loads, improper signaling between workers and equipment operators, and lack of hard hat requirements contribute to these fatal incidents. Crane accidents, in particular, pose severe risks when operators lack proper training or equipment maintenance is neglected.
Caught-In or Between Hazards – Workers can become trapped in or crushed by collapsing trenches, cave-ins, or heavy machinery. Excavation work requires protective systems like shoring, shielding, or sloping when trenches exceed five feet deep, as mandated by OSHA regulations. Failures to implement these protections or to inspect excavation sites regularly can lead to sudden collapses that provide workers no opportunity to escape.
Electrocutions – Contact with power lines, exposed wiring, or defective electrical equipment causes fatal electrocutions on construction sites. These accidents frequently occur when equipment contacts overhead power lines, when temporary wiring is improperly installed, or when workers perform electrical work without proper training or protective equipment. Construction sites must maintain safe distances from power lines and ensure all electrical systems are properly grounded.
Equipment Malfunctions – Defective or poorly maintained construction equipment including cranes, forklifts, bulldozers, and power tools can malfunction with fatal consequences. Equipment manufacturers may bear liability for design defects or inadequate safety features, while construction companies and equipment rental companies may be liable for failing to properly maintain machinery or conduct required inspections.
Structural Collapses – Buildings under construction or demolition can collapse when structural supports fail, when materials are improperly stored creating excessive weight, or when demolition procedures disregard structural integrity. These catastrophic events often kill multiple workers simultaneously and may involve complex liability questions spanning architects, engineers, general contractors, and specialty subcontractors.
Arizona Revised Statutes § 12-612 establishes the legal framework for wrongful death actions in the state. This statute grants surviving family members the right to seek compensation when a loved one’s death results from the wrongful act or negligence of another party, but it also imposes strict procedural requirements and deadlines that families must meet to preserve their legal rights.
The statute of limitations for wrongful death claims in Arizona is two years from the date of death under A.R.S. § 12-542. This deadline is absolute in most cases, meaning claims filed even one day late will be permanently barred. For construction accident deaths, the two-year period begins on the date the victim died, which may differ from the date of the accident if the victim survived for some period after the initial injury.
Certain circumstances may affect the standard two-year deadline. If the death resulted from intentional wrongful conduct by the defendant, the statute of limitations may be extended. When the cause of death was not immediately discoverable, Arizona courts may apply the discovery rule, which starts the clock when the plaintiff knew or reasonably should have known about the wrongful death and its cause. However, courts apply this exception narrowly, and families should never assume they have additional time beyond the standard two-year period.
Arizona law carefully restricts who may bring wrongful death lawsuits. Only the personal representative of the deceased person’s estate has standing to file the claim under A.R.S. § 12-612. This representative acts on behalf of the deceased’s statutory beneficiaries, who are the individuals entitled to receive compensation if the lawsuit succeeds.
If the deceased person had a will, that document typically names an executor who becomes the personal representative after probate court approval. When no will exists, Arizona intestacy laws determine who has priority to serve as personal representative, generally following this order: surviving spouse, adult children, parents, siblings, and other next of kin. The probate court must formally appoint the personal representative through letters of administration before they can proceed with the wrongful death lawsuit.
Statutory beneficiaries who may receive compensation include the surviving spouse, children, parents (if the deceased was a minor child), and other individuals who were dependent on the deceased for support. Arizona law does not require beneficiaries to prove financial dependency except in cases involving non-immediate family members. The personal representative has a fiduciary duty to pursue the claim for the benefit of all qualifying beneficiaries and must distribute any recovery according to Arizona law.
Arizona wrongful death claims seek to compensate surviving family members for both economic and non-economic losses resulting from their loved one’s death. These damages recognize that the death has created measurable financial hardships and immeasurable emotional suffering that money can never fully address but can help alleviate.
Economic damages compensate for quantifiable financial losses that flow directly from the death. Lost wages and benefits represent the income the deceased would have earned over their remaining work life, calculated based on their earning history, education, skills, career trajectory, and work life expectancy. In construction accident cases involving skilled tradespeople, these projections often account for regular wage increases, union benefits, and the potential for advancement to supervisory or specialty positions that command higher pay.
Medical expenses incurred between the accident and death are recoverable, including emergency transportation, hospitalization, surgery, medication, and all treatment related to the fatal injuries. Funeral and burial costs provide another category of economic damages, covering reasonable expenses for services, burial plot or cremation, casket or urn, and memorial services. Loss of benefits extends to health insurance, retirement contributions, and other employment benefits the deceased provided to family members.
Non-economic damages address the intangible but profound losses families experience. Loss of companionship and consortium compensates spouses for the loss of their partner’s love, affection, comfort, and sexual relationship. Loss of guidance and support recognizes that children have lost a parent’s wisdom, advice, and emotional support throughout their remaining childhood and into adulthood.
Pain and suffering may be recoverable if the deceased survived for any period after the accident and experienced conscious suffering before death. The severity and duration of this pre-death suffering directly affects the compensation amount. Mental anguish experienced by surviving family members as they cope with the sudden loss of their loved one represents another component of non-economic damages.
Arizona permits punitive damages in wrongful death cases when the defendant’s conduct was especially egregious. Under A.R.S. § 12-613, courts may award punitive damages when clear and convincing evidence shows the defendant acted with evil mind or conscious disregard for the rights and safety of others. Construction companies that deliberately ignore known safety hazards, fail to implement required protections despite repeated warnings, or engage in systematic safety violations may face punitive damages designed to punish misconduct and deter similar behavior.
Construction accident wrongful death cases often involve multiple potentially liable parties. Identifying all responsible defendants is essential to maximizing recovery, as Arizona law allows families to seek compensation from every party whose negligence contributed to the fatal accident.
General Contractors – The general contractor overseeing a construction project bears primary responsibility for maintaining overall site safety. They must ensure all subcontractors follow proper safety protocols, coordinate work to prevent hazardous interactions between different trades, provide adequate safety equipment, and maintain compliance with OSHA regulations and Arizona workplace safety laws. General contractors cannot escape liability by delegating safety responsibilities to subcontractors when they retain control over the worksite.
Subcontractors – Specialty subcontractors hired to perform specific work like electrical installation, plumbing, or structural steel erection have independent duties to protect their own workers and others on the site. A subcontractor whose negligent work creates a hazard that kills someone outside their own crew may face liability even if the general contractor also shares responsibility.
Property Owners – The owner of the construction site may be liable for wrongful death if they retained some control over safety conditions, knew about dangerous conditions and failed to correct them, or hired an incompetent contractor. Arizona courts examine the degree of control the property owner exercised over the work and whether they had actual or constructive notice of the hazard that caused death.
Equipment Manufacturers – When defective tools, machinery, or safety equipment contribute to a fatal accident, the manufacturer may face strict product liability claims. These claims do not require proof of negligence, only evidence that the product contained a design defect, manufacturing defect, or inadequate warnings that made it unreasonably dangerous and caused the death.
Architects and Engineers – Design professionals who create construction plans bear responsibility for ensuring their designs are structurally sound and can be built safely. An architect or engineer whose negligent design creates inherent construction hazards or whose inadequate specifications lead to structural failures may be liable when workers die as a result.
Equipment Rental Companies – Companies that rent construction equipment have duties to maintain that equipment in safe working condition and provide appropriate warnings about proper use. A rental company that provides defective equipment or fails to conduct required maintenance inspections may share liability if equipment failure causes a fatality.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration establishes federal workplace safety standards that construction sites must follow. OSHA violations often provide crucial evidence in wrongful death claims, though the regulatory system operates separately from civil litigation.
OSHA regulations cover virtually every aspect of construction site safety under 29 C.F.R. Part 1926. These standards address fall protection requirements, excavation and trenching safety, scaffolding specifications, electrical safety protocols, personal protective equipment requirements, hazard communication, crane operation, and countless other specific hazards. Construction companies must not only comply with these detailed regulations but also provide the general duty of care required under Section 5(a)(1) of the OSH Act, which mandates that employers provide a workplace free from recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious injury.
When a fatal construction accident occurs, OSHA typically conducts an investigation to determine whether safety violations contributed to the death. These investigations can uncover critical evidence including witness statements, photographs of the accident scene, equipment inspections, and analysis of whether required safety measures were in place. OSHA citations issued after an investigation carry significant weight in civil wrongful death cases, as they represent an official finding that safety violations occurred.
Successful wrongful death claims require proving that the defendant’s negligence caused the fatal accident. This burden of proof rests on the plaintiff, who must establish each element of negligence through credible evidence that convinces the judge or jury more likely than not that the defendant is liable.
The first element requires showing the defendant owed a legal duty to the deceased person to act with reasonable care for their safety. Construction companies owe duties to their own employees, workers employed by subcontractors on their sites, and in some cases to visitors and passersby. The specific scope of this duty depends on the defendant’s role in the construction project and the relationship to the victim.
For employees, Arizona Workers’ Compensation laws establish that employers have non-delegable duties to provide reasonably safe workplaces, though workers’ compensation usually prevents employees from suing their direct employers in tort. For workers employed by subcontractors, general contractors who control the worksite typically owe duties to protect all workers from hazards they create or should have remedied. Property owners who hire independent contractors generally do not owe duties to the contractor’s employees unless they retain control over safety conditions or the work involves inherently dangerous activities.
Once duty is established, the plaintiff must prove the defendant breached that duty through negligent conduct. This involves showing the defendant failed to act as a reasonably prudent construction company, property owner, or equipment provider would have acted under similar circumstances. Evidence of breach may include violation of OSHA safety regulations, failure to follow industry safety standards, inadequate worker training, lack of required safety equipment, failure to correct known hazards, or disregard of manufacturer’s safety instructions.
Expert testimony from construction safety professionals, engineers, or industry specialists often proves essential to establishing breach. These experts can explain what safety measures should have been in place, how the defendant’s conduct fell below industry standards, and what a reasonable party would have done to prevent the accident.
The plaintiff must establish both actual cause and proximate cause connecting the defendant’s breach to the death. Actual causation requires proving the death would not have occurred but for the defendant’s negligence. Proximate causation requires showing the death was a foreseeable result of the negligent conduct, not a highly improbable consequence that no reasonable person would have anticipated.
In construction accidents, causation questions can become complex when multiple parties’ actions contributed to the fatal incident or when the victim’s own conduct played some role. Arizona follows comparative negligence principles under A.R.S. § 12-2505, allowing recovery even when the deceased person was partially at fault, though any damages award will be reduced by their percentage of fault.
The final element requires proving the death caused compensable damages to the surviving family members. This involves producing evidence of the deceased’s earnings, benefits, and financial contributions to the family, as well as testimony about the emotional relationship and the impact of the loss on surviving relatives. Medical bills, funeral expenses, and other economic losses require documentation through receipts and invoices.
Thorough investigation forms the foundation of every successful wrongful death claim. The evidence gathered immediately after the accident often proves impossible to recreate later, making prompt investigation essential to preserving critical information.
An experienced Tucson construction accident wrongful death lawyer begins by securing the accident scene and documenting its condition through photographs and video before any cleanup or remediation occurs. This visual evidence captures the exact positions of equipment, materials, and safety devices at the time of the accident, providing an objective record that can later be analyzed by experts.
Witness interviews must occur as soon as possible while memories remain fresh. Construction sites employ numerous workers who may have seen the accident, observed unsafe conditions beforehand, or heard supervisors discussing safety concerns. These witnesses may scatter to other job sites within days, making immediate interviews crucial. An attorney can preserve testimony through recorded statements or affidavits that can be used later if witnesses become unavailable or their memories fade.
When construction workers die in workplace accidents, their families face questions about whether to pursue workers’ compensation death benefits, wrongful death lawsuits, or both. Understanding how these two systems interact is essential to maximizing recovery and avoiding procedural mistakes that could jeopardize either claim.
Arizona workers’ compensation law provides death benefits to dependents of workers killed in workplace accidents regardless of fault. These benefits include burial expenses up to a statutory limit, a lump-sum payment to the surviving spouse or other dependents, and ongoing monthly payments based on the deceased worker’s wages. Under A.R.S. § 23-1046, these benefits are the exclusive remedy against the direct employer, meaning families cannot sue the employer in civil court even when negligence caused the death.
However, the workers’ compensation exclusive remedy rule does not protect other parties whose negligence contributed to the fatal accident. Families can pursue wrongful death lawsuits against general contractors when the deceased worked for a subcontractor, against subcontractors when the deceased worked for a different subcontractor or the general contractor, against property owners, equipment manufacturers, and any other third party whose negligence caused the death.
These third-party wrongful death claims can provide substantially greater compensation than workers’ compensation benefits alone. While workers’ compensation covers only specific economic losses at rates set by statute, wrongful death lawsuits can recover unlimited economic damages, non-economic damages for loss of companionship and emotional suffering, and potentially punitive damages. The workers’ compensation carrier typically holds a lien against any third-party recovery for benefits already paid, but families still generally receive significantly more through combined claims than workers’ compensation alone.
Most construction accident wrongful death claims resolve through settlement rather than trial. Settlement negotiations require strategic preparation, thorough documentation of damages, and skilled advocacy to counter insurance company tactics designed to minimize payouts.
Insurance companies defending construction accident wrongful death claims typically conduct extensive investigations of their own, searching for evidence that could reduce their liability or limit damages. They may argue the deceased worker’s own negligence contributed to the accident, attempt to shift blame between multiple defendants, or dispute the extent of economic losses claimed by the family. A Tucson construction accident wrongful death lawyer counters these defenses by presenting compelling evidence of the defendant’s negligence and the full scope of damages.
Demand letters initiating settlement discussions must be comprehensive and persuasive, presenting a complete picture of liability and damages supported by evidence. These letters typically include accident reports, witness statements, expert opinions on causation and safety violations, medical records, employment and wage documentation, and detailed calculations of economic losses. Including evidence of the deceased’s relationship with surviving family members and their impact on loved ones strengthens the non-economic damage claims.
When settlement negotiations fail to produce fair compensation, filing a wrongful death lawsuit becomes necessary. Arizona wrongful death litigation follows the standard civil procedure process but involves unique considerations given the claims’ high stakes and emotional nature.
The wrongful death lawsuit begins when the personal representative files a complaint in the appropriate Arizona Superior Court. Venue is proper in the county where the defendant resides, where the construction accident occurred, or where the deceased person lived under A.R.S. § 12-401. The complaint must allege facts supporting each element of negligence, identify all defendants and their roles in causing the death, specify the damages sought, and demonstrate the plaintiff’s standing as the personal representative acting on behalf of statutory beneficiaries.
Arizona courts require personal service of the complaint and summons on each defendant. Defendants then have twenty days to file an answer or motion to dismiss. Construction companies often file answers denying liability while asserting various affirmative defenses such as comparative negligence, assumption of risk, or compliance with safety regulations.
Discovery allows both sides to gather evidence through various formal mechanisms. Interrogatories are written questions that parties must answer under oath, covering topics like safety policies, accident investigations, witness identities, and damage calculations. Document requests seek production of safety inspection reports, training records, accident scene photographs, OSHA citations, employment records, financial documents, and any other relevant materials.
Depositions involve oral testimony under oath before a court reporter, creating a permanent record that can be used at trial. Key deposition witnesses in construction accident wrongful death cases typically include corporate representatives who testify about company policies and the specific project, supervisors who oversaw the work where the accident occurred, co-workers who witnessed the accident or unsafe conditions, expert witnesses offering opinions on safety standards and causation, and family members who testify about their relationship with the deceased and the impact of the loss.
Expert witnesses provide critical evidence in most construction accident wrongful death trials. Safety experts analyze whether defendants followed proper construction safety protocols and industry standards. Accident reconstruction specialists examine physical evidence to determine exactly how the accident occurred and what could have prevented it. Economic experts calculate lost earnings and benefits over the deceased’s remaining work life. Medical experts testify about the cause of death and any suffering the victim experienced before dying.
Wrongful death trials before an Arizona jury typically span several days to several weeks depending on case complexity. The plaintiff presents evidence first, establishing the defendant’s duty of care, breach of that duty through negligent conduct, causation linking the negligence to the death, and damages suffered by surviving family members. The defense then presents evidence attempting to refute liability or limit damages.
Jury instructions explain the legal standards jurors must apply when deciding whether the defendant is liable and what damages to award. Arizona pattern jury instructions cover the elements of negligence, comparative fault allocation, and proper consideration of economic and non-economic damages. The jury deliberates privately and returns a verdict specifying whether the defendant is liable and the amount of damages awarded to the estate for distribution to beneficiaries.
The attorney you select to represent your family in a construction accident wrongful death claim significantly impacts both the outcome of the case and your experience throughout the legal process. Evaluating potential lawyers based on specific criteria helps ensure you choose representation capable of maximizing your recovery.
Experience handling wrongful death claims specifically, not just general personal injury work, matters because these cases involve unique procedural requirements, damage issues, and emotional considerations. A lawyer should demonstrate a track record of successful wrongful death recoveries through both settlements and trial verdicts. Construction accident experience adds another crucial layer, as these cases require understanding OSHA regulations, construction industry safety standards, equipment operation, and the complex web of contractors, subcontractors, and other parties typically involved in construction projects.
Resources to fully investigate and litigate your claim include access to qualified expert witnesses, ability to front costs for depositions and investigations, relationships with accident reconstruction specialists, and capacity to handle complex multi-defendant litigation against well-funded corporate defendants and their insurance carriers. Smaller firms without adequate resources may struggle to compete against the defense teams that construction companies and insurers deploy.
Arizona law provides two years from the date of death to file a wrongful death lawsuit under A.R.S. § 12-542. This deadline is strictly enforced, and claims filed even one day late will be permanently barred except in rare circumstances. If the death occurred some time after the initial accident, the two-year period begins on the date of death, not the date of the accident. Given the time required to investigate the accident, identify all liable parties, and prepare a comprehensive complaint, families should consult with a Tucson construction accident wrongful death lawyer as soon as possible rather than waiting until the deadline approaches.
Yes, Arizona’s comparative negligence law under A.R.S. § 12-2505 allows recovery even when the deceased person bears some responsibility for the accident. The jury will assign a percentage of fault to each party, and your damages will be reduced by your loved one’s percentage of fault. For example, if total damages are determined to be two million dollars and the jury finds your family member was twenty percent at fault, the recovery would be reduced to one million six hundred thousand dollars. You can only recover if the deceased person’s fault was less than one hundred percent, meaning at least some portion of blame must rest with the defendant.
OSHA compliance, while important, does not automatically shield a construction company from liability. OSHA regulations establish minimum safety standards, but companies still have a broader duty under Arizona law to exercise reasonable care for worker safety. Additionally, OSHA violations can strengthen your case significantly, but the absence of formal violations does not mean negligence did not occur. Your attorney can present expert testimony showing that even if minimum regulatory standards were technically met, the defendant failed to follow industry best practices or should have recognized and addressed hazards that caused the fatal accident.
Arizona law specifies the distribution of wrongful death recoveries. The personal representative receives the damages on behalf of the deceased’s estate but must distribute them to statutory beneficiaries according to A.R.S. § 12-612. Surviving spouses, children, and parents of minor children are the primary beneficiaries. If the deceased had no spouse or children, parents may receive the recovery. The court will determine the appropriate distribution if beneficiaries cannot agree, considering factors like each beneficiary’s relationship with the deceased, financial dependency, and degree of loss suffered.
The timeline varies significantly based on case complexity, the number of defendants involved, and whether settlement is reached or trial becomes necessary. Simple cases with clear liability and a single defendant may settle within six to twelve months. Complex cases involving multiple contractors, disputed liability, or significant damages may require eighteen months to three years or longer. OSHA investigations, expert analysis, extensive discovery, and trial preparation all require time to complete properly. While no attorney can guarantee a specific timeline, an experienced lawyer can provide realistic expectations based on the specific circumstances of your case.
Yes, immigration status does not affect the right to file a wrongful death claim under Arizona law. Undocumented workers and their families have the same legal protections as any other workers when negligence causes death. Courts cannot consider immigration status when determining liability or calculating damages. Some families fear that pursuing legal action may expose them to immigration consequences, but working with an experienced attorney who understands these concerns can help protect your family while pursuing the compensation you deserve. Your attorney can address legitimate concerns about privacy and ensure that the legal process does not unnecessarily risk your family’s immigration status.
Arizona law allows you to pursue claims against all parties whose negligence contributed to the fatal accident. In construction cases, this often includes general contractors, subcontractors, property owners, equipment manufacturers, and others. Each defendant is jointly and severally liable for the full amount of damages under A.R.S. § 12-2506, meaning you can collect the entire judgment from any defendant regardless of their percentage of fault. This protects families when one defendant lacks sufficient insurance or assets to pay their share. The defendants can then seek contribution from each other based on their respective degrees of fault.
No, accepting workers’ compensation death benefits does not prevent you from filing a wrongful death lawsuit against third parties whose negligence caused the death. You cannot sue your loved one’s direct employer due to workers’ compensation exclusivity, but you can pursue claims against any other negligent party. The workers’ compensation carrier will typically assert a lien against your wrongful death recovery for benefits they paid, but families still generally receive substantially more compensation through combined claims than workers’ compensation alone. Your attorney can negotiate with the workers’ compensation carrier to reduce their lien, maximizing your net recovery.
Losing a family member in a construction accident creates overwhelming grief that no legal remedy can fully address. However, pursuing a wrongful death claim serves important purposes beyond financial compensation—it holds negligent parties accountable, promotes safer construction practices that protect other workers, and provides your family the resources needed to move forward without the financial devastation these tragedies often cause. Arizona’s two-year statute of limitations means that time is limited to protect your rights and pursue the justice your family deserves.
Wrongful Death Trial Attorney LLC understands the profound loss construction accident deaths inflict on families throughout Tucson and across Arizona. Our legal team combines compassionate client service with aggressive litigation skills to maximize recovery in even the most complex wrongful death claims. We handle every aspect of your case while you focus on healing and supporting your family, and we never charge legal fees unless we recover compensation on your behalf. Call (480) 420-0500 or complete our online contact form to schedule your free consultation and learn how we can help your family pursue justice and accountability for your loved one’s wrongful death.