We represent families across Arizona in wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases. Every case is prepared for trial from the beginning.
When an employee dies in a workplace accident, their family faces devastating emotional and financial consequences that no amount of money can truly remedy. In Tempe, Arizona, wrongful death claims arising from workplace fatalities involve complex intersections of workers’ compensation law, third-party liability, and wrongful death statutes that require specialized legal navigation.
Unlike typical workplace injuries that fall exclusively under workers’ compensation, fatal workplace accidents often create opportunities for families to pursue additional compensation beyond standard death benefits. Arizona law recognizes that certain workplace deaths result from negligence by parties other than the employer, equipment manufacturers who produce defective machinery, or violations of workplace safety regulations so egregious they warrant expanded legal accountability. A Tempe workplace accident wrongful death lawyer understands how to identify all potential sources of compensation and build comprehensive claims that address both immediate financial needs and long-term family security.
Wrongful Death Trial Attorney LLC represents families who have lost loved ones in Tempe workplace accidents, providing compassionate legal guidance while aggressively pursuing maximum compensation. Our firm handles all aspects of wrongful death claims arising from workplace fatalities, from investigating accident causes to negotiating with multiple insurance carriers and litigating complex liability issues. If your family has suffered the loss of a loved one in a workplace accident, contact Wrongful Death Trial Attorney LLC at (480) 420-0500 or submit our online consultation form to discuss your legal options with an experienced Tempe workplace accident wrongful death lawyer.
Workplace wrongful death claims differ fundamentally from standard workers’ compensation death benefits because they address circumstances where someone other than the employer bears legal responsibility for the fatal accident. Under Arizona Revised Statutes § 12-611, the surviving spouse or children have the right to file wrongful death claims when their loved one dies due to another party’s wrongful act, neglect, or default. These claims exist separately from workers’ compensation benefits and can provide substantially greater compensation.
Workers’ compensation provides limited death benefits including burial expenses up to $5,000 and monthly payments to surviving dependents, but it prohibits survivors from suing the employer directly regardless of how the death occurred. However, this employer immunity does not extend to third parties whose negligence contributed to the fatal accident. When construction workers die because of defective equipment, warehouse employees suffer fatal injuries due to inadequate safety measures by property owners, or delivery drivers are killed by negligent motorists, families may pursue wrongful death claims against these responsible parties in addition to collecting workers’ compensation benefits.
The distinction matters enormously for surviving families. Workers’ compensation death benefits replace only a portion of the deceased worker’s wages and provide nothing for the family’s emotional loss or the victim’s pain before death. Wrongful death claims under Arizona law allow recovery of economic damages including full lost future earnings, medical expenses incurred before death, funeral costs, and non-economic damages for loss of companionship, guidance, and the emotional devastation the family experiences. A Tempe workplace accident wrongful death lawyer evaluates both avenues of compensation to maximize the family’s total recovery.
Fatal workplace accidents in Tempe occur across numerous industries, each presenting distinct legal considerations and liability issues. Construction sites generate a significant percentage of workplace deaths through falls from heights, electrocutions, being struck by equipment or materials, and trench collapses. Arizona’s construction industry continues expanding throughout Tempe, and contractors often prioritize speed over safety, creating dangerous conditions that result in preventable deaths.
Manufacturing and warehouse facilities expose workers to heavy machinery, forklifts, conveyor systems, and elevated storage areas where accidents frequently prove fatal. When equipment lacks proper safeguards, maintenance is neglected, or workers receive inadequate training, the resulting accidents can kill experienced employees. Third-party equipment manufacturers or maintenance contractors who fail to address known hazards may bear liability beyond the employer’s workers’ compensation responsibility.
Transportation-related workplace deaths affect delivery drivers, commercial truck drivers, and employees whose jobs require regular travel. These accidents often involve negligent third-party drivers who cause collisions that kill workers while they are performing job duties. Because the at-fault driver is not the employer, surviving families can pursue full wrongful death claims against that driver and their insurance carrier while also receiving workers’ compensation death benefits. Service industry workers including those in restaurants, retail stores, and hospitality businesses face fatal accidents from violent attacks, vehicle strikes in parking lots, or dangerous premises conditions on properties their employer does not control.
Arizona’s wrongful death statute, A.R.S. § 12-612, establishes a specific hierarchy for who may file a wrongful death claim after a workplace fatality. The surviving spouse holds the exclusive right to file the claim during the first six months after death. This exclusivity protects the surviving spouse’s legal position and prevents conflicts among family members during the immediate aftermath of loss. If no spouse exists or if the spouse does not file within six months, the right to file passes to the deceased worker’s children.
When neither spouse nor children exist, or if they do not file within the applicable time period, the personal representative of the deceased worker’s estate may pursue the wrongful death claim. The personal representative is appointed through probate court and acts on behalf of all statutory beneficiaries who would benefit from any recovery. This legal framework ensures that someone with proper legal standing can always pursue justice when a workplace accident results in wrongful death.
Time limits for filing workplace wrongful death claims are strictly enforced in Arizona courts. Under A.R.S. § 12-542, wrongful death actions must be filed within two years from the date of death. This deadline is absolute, and Arizona courts have no authority to extend it except in extremely rare circumstances involving fraudulent concealment of the death’s cause or legal disability of all potential plaintiffs.
The two-year period begins running on the date of death, not the date of the accident if those dates differ. In some workplace accidents, victims survive for days or weeks before succumbing to their injuries. The statute of limitations clock starts when death occurs, not when the initial injury happened. This distinction can affect available evidence and witness memories, making early legal consultation critical even when death does not occur immediately after the accident.
Missing the statute of limitations deadline means losing the right to pursue any wrongful death claim forever, regardless of how clear the liability or how devastating the family’s losses. Insurance companies know these deadlines and often delay settlement negotiations hoping families will run out of time. A Tempe workplace accident wrongful death lawyer monitors all applicable deadlines and files claims in time to preserve your family’s legal rights.
Understanding the relationship between workers’ compensation death benefits and third-party wrongful death claims is essential for maximizing recovery. These two systems operate independently and address different aspects of workplace fatal accidents. Workers’ compensation provides immediate benefits without requiring proof of fault, while wrongful death claims require establishing that a third party’s negligence caused the death but offer substantially greater compensation.
Workers’ compensation death benefits in Arizona include burial expenses up to $5,000 and monthly income benefits to surviving dependents. The monthly benefit amount equals two-thirds of the deceased worker’s average monthly wage, subject to statutory maximums that change annually. Surviving spouses receive these benefits until remarriage, and dependent children receive payments until age 18 or age 22 if enrolled full-time in educational institutions.
These benefits begin quickly after filing a claim with the employer’s workers’ compensation carrier and do not require proving anyone was at fault. The employer cannot be sued for wrongful death even if they violated safety regulations or acted recklessly. This trade-off provides families with immediate financial support but limits total recovery compared to what wrongful death claims can provide.
Wrongful death claims against third parties allow recovery of all economic losses including the deceased worker’s full future earning capacity calculated through retirement age, medical expenses incurred before death, funeral and burial costs, and loss of benefits such as health insurance and retirement contributions. These calculations often produce award values many times larger than workers’ compensation death benefits. Non-economic damages compensate the family for loss of companionship, guidance, love, affection, and the emotional trauma of losing their loved one. Arizona law does not cap non-economic damages in wrongful death cases arising from workplace accidents.
Families can pursue both workers’ compensation death benefits and third-party wrongful death claims simultaneously when applicable. Any settlement or judgment from the wrongful death claim may be subject to a workers’ compensation lien, meaning the workers’ compensation carrier can recover some of what they paid in benefits. However, even after reimbursing the workers’ compensation lien, families typically recover substantially more through wrongful death claims than they would receive from workers’ compensation alone.
Identifying third-party defendants who share liability for workplace deaths requires thorough investigation of how the accident occurred and who controlled the conditions that caused it. Third-party liability exists when someone other than the employer or a co-worker contributed to the fatal accident through negligent or wrongful conduct. These cases allow families to pursue full wrongful death damages not available through workers’ compensation.
When workplace deaths occur on construction sites or properties the employer does not own, the property owner or general contractor may bear liability for unsafe conditions they created or failed to correct. Arizona premises liability law requires property owners to maintain reasonably safe conditions and warn of known hazards. General contractors who control work sites owe duties to all workers present, not just their own employees. If inadequate fall protection, electrical hazards, or structural defects cause a worker’s death, the property owner or general contractor may be liable even though the victim worked for a subcontractor.
Defective machinery and equipment cause numerous fatal workplace accidents when design flaws, manufacturing defects, or inadequate safety features create unreasonable dangers. Product liability claims against manufacturers proceed under strict liability principles in Arizona, meaning families need not prove the manufacturer was negligent, only that the product was defective and caused death. Machine guards that fail, malfunctioning safety systems, or equipment that operates differently than reasonably expected can support wrongful death claims against manufacturers and distributors.
Third-party contractors hired to maintain equipment, repair building systems, or provide services at workplaces may cause fatal accidents through negligent work. If faulty electrical repairs cause electrocution, improperly maintained elevators malfunction and kill workers, or negligent HVAC work creates toxic fume exposure, the maintenance contractor may be liable. These defendants often carry substantial insurance coverage because they work at multiple locations and understand their potential liability exposure.
Transportation workers killed by other drivers on public roads generate wrongful death claims against the at-fault driver. Arizona follows a comparative negligence system under A.R.S. § 12-2505, so families can recover damages even if the deceased worker was partially at fault, though the recovery is reduced proportionally. Commercial drivers who cause fatal accidents may create liability for their employers under respondeat superior principles, potentially providing additional insurance coverage for the family’s claim.
Pursuing wrongful death compensation after a workplace fatality involves multiple coordinated legal actions that require strategic planning and precise execution. Understanding this process helps families know what to expect and how long resolution may take.
The foundation of any successful wrongful death claim is thorough investigation completed before critical evidence disappears. Workplace accident scenes are often cleaned up quickly, equipment is repaired or removed, and witnesses’ memories fade. Immediate investigation preserves evidence through photographs, measurements, witness interviews, and document collection. OSHA may conduct its own investigation of fatal workplace accidents, and their findings can provide valuable evidence for civil claims.
Physical evidence including failed equipment parts, safety harnesses that broke, or structural components that collapsed must be preserved and examined by experts who can determine why the failure occurred. Spoliation of evidence, where parties destroy or alter evidence, can result in court sanctions that benefit the wrongful death claim. A Tempe workplace accident wrongful death lawyer acts quickly to send preservation letters to all potential defendants requiring them to maintain all relevant evidence.
Complex workplace fatal accidents often involve multiple parties who share responsibility. Comprehensive investigation identifies every entity whose negligence contributed to the death because each defendant may have separate insurance coverage. Construction accidents might involve the property owner, general contractor, subcontractor, equipment rental companies, and product manufacturers. Each defendant’s insurance policy represents potential compensation for the family.
Insurance coverage investigation determines policy limits, additional insured relationships, and whether umbrella policies provide coverage beyond primary policy limits. Defendants often have incentive to shift blame to other parties, and these disputes can benefit families by establishing multiple sources of liability. However, coordinating claims against numerous defendants requires sophisticated legal strategy to prevent defendants from successfully arguing the victim or another party was solely responsible.
Wrongful death claims typically begin with settlement demand letters sent to all identified defendants and their insurance carriers. These demands summarize the evidence, establish liability, document damages, and request settlement within policy limits. Some cases settle during this pre-litigation phase when liability is clear and insurance coverage is adequate. Many workplace wrongful death cases require filing a lawsuit to force serious settlement negotiations or to proceed to trial when settlement offers are inadequate.
Litigation timelines vary but typically take 18 to 36 months from filing to trial, though settlement can occur at any point during this process. Discovery procedures including depositions, document production, and expert reports develop evidence and define the legal issues. Arizona courts may order mediation before trial, providing a structured settlement negotiation process with a neutral third-party mediator. Trial preparation intensifies in the months before the scheduled trial date, though most cases settle before trial begins when defendants face strong evidence and the certainty of jury deliberation.
Arizona wrongful death statutes allow recovery of comprehensive damages that address both economic losses and the family’s emotional suffering. These damages typically far exceed workers’ compensation death benefits and can provide long-term financial security for surviving family members.
Economic damages compensate for measurable financial losses the family suffers because of the death. Lost future earnings represent the most significant economic damage in most cases, calculated by determining what the deceased worker would have earned through their expected retirement age, accounting for likely raises, promotions, and career advancement. Economists and vocational experts analyze wage data, work history, and industry trends to project lifetime earning capacity accurately.
Loss of benefits including health insurance, retirement contributions, stock options, and other employment benefits adds to economic damages. Medical expenses incurred treating injuries before death, even if workers’ compensation paid them initially, can be recovered in wrongful death claims. Funeral and burial expenses, though seemingly modest compared to other damages, represent real costs families must bear immediately after loss.
Non-economic damages address losses that have no precise dollar value but profoundly impact surviving family members’ lives. Loss of companionship compensates spouses for losing their partner’s emotional support, intimacy, and daily presence. Loss of guidance and parental care compensates children for growing up without a parent’s wisdom, discipline, and nurturing. The emotional anguish and mental suffering families endure after losing a loved one to a preventable workplace accident warrants substantial compensation even though no amount of money can restore what was lost.
Arizona does not impose caps on non-economic damages in wrongful death cases, unlike some states that limit these recoveries. Juries determine non-economic damages based on evidence of the family’s relationship with the deceased, the circumstances of death, and the impact on each family member’s life. These damages often equal or exceed economic damages in cases involving strong family bonds and particularly tragic circumstances.
Workplace wrongful death claims involve legal complexities that general practice attorneys rarely encounter and that families cannot navigate alone while grieving. The intersection of workers’ compensation law, wrongful death statutes, product liability principles, and premises liability rules creates procedural and substantive challenges that require specialized knowledge and experience.
Insurance companies defending workplace wrongful death claims employ experienced attorneys and investigators who immediately begin building defenses and minimizing liability. They understand that families in crisis often lack knowledge of their legal rights and may accept inadequate settlements out of immediate financial need. Without experienced legal representation, families risk settling claims for fractions of their true value or missing crucial filing deadlines that permanently bar recovery.
Wrongful Death Trial Attorney LLC focuses specifically on wrongful death litigation and understands the full scope of damages families deserve after workplace fatalities. Our firm works with economists, vocational experts, accident reconstruction specialists, and medical professionals who provide testimony supporting maximum compensation. We handle all communication with insurance carriers, manage complex litigation procedures, and refuse to settle cases for less than families need and deserve. Our contingency fee structure means families pay nothing unless we recover compensation, removing financial barriers to accessing experienced legal representation.
OSHA regulations and Arizona workplace safety laws establish minimum standards employers and contractors must follow to protect worker safety. When fatal accidents result from violations of these regulations, the violations provide powerful evidence of negligence in wrongful death claims. While OSHA violations themselves do not create private causes of action, courts allow wrongful death plaintiffs to introduce evidence of safety violations to establish the defendant breached their duty of care.
After fatal workplace accidents, OSHA conducts investigations and may issue citations documenting specific safety regulation violations. These citations identify violated regulations, describe the hazardous conditions, and establish that the defendant knew or should have known about the violation. Defense attorneys often argue OSHA citations should be excluded from civil trials, but Arizona courts generally allow them as evidence of negligence. Citations issued to general contractors, property owners, or equipment manufacturers strengthen third-party wrongful death claims by establishing clear regulatory violations.
OSHA penalties for workplace safety violations are typically modest compared to wrongful death damages, but the citations themselves provide independent verification of unsafe conditions. When citations document violations that directly caused the fatal accident, they can be decisive evidence in settlement negotiations because they establish negligence that juries will likely find compelling. A Tempe workplace accident wrongful death lawyer obtains complete OSHA investigation files including witness statements, photographs, and measurements that support the family’s claims.
When OSHA determines safety violations were willful, meaning the employer intentionally disregarded regulations, or repeated, meaning similar violations were cited previously, the findings suggest particularly egregious conduct. Willful violations can support claims for punitive damages in some circumstances, though Arizona law limits when punitive damages are available. Evidence of repeated violations demonstrates a pattern of disregard for worker safety that makes jury awards more likely and larger.
Immigrant workers, both documented and undocumented, are entitled to full wrongful death compensation when they are killed in workplace accidents. Immigration status does not affect the right to file wrongful death claims or the damages recoverable under Arizona law. Federal and Arizona courts have consistently held that tort law protections apply equally regardless of immigration status.
Defense attorneys sometimes attempt to argue that undocumented workers should receive reduced damages because they might have been deported or might not have remained in the U.S. workforce long-term. Arizona courts have rejected these arguments, recognizing that allowing immigration status to reduce damages would create perverse incentives for defendants to hire undocumented workers specifically because they could pay less compensation if accidents occur. Economic damages for lost future earnings must be calculated based on U.S. wage rates regardless of immigration status.
Families concerned about immigration consequences of pursuing wrongful death claims should understand that immigration enforcement agencies typically do not become involved in civil wrongful death litigation. A Tempe workplace accident wrongful death lawyer handles these cases with sensitivity to immigration concerns while ensuring families receive full compensation they are legally entitled to under Arizona wrongful death law.
Insurance carriers defending workplace wrongful death claims routinely make early settlement offers designed to resolve cases quickly for amounts far below true value. These offers come when families face immediate financial crisis from losing their primary income earner and may feel desperate to accept any payment. Understanding common insurance company tactics helps families avoid accepting inadequate settlements that forever bar additional compensation.
Adjusters create artificial urgency by claiming settlement offers expire soon or suggesting that waiting will reduce available compensation. They may imply that filing a lawsuit will take years with no guarantee of success, making immediate settlement seem like the only practical option. These tactics exploit families’ financial vulnerability and lack of legal knowledge. In reality, properly valued claims typically increase in settlement value over time as evidence develops and trial approaches, not decrease.
Defense attorneys often argue the deceased worker was partially or entirely at fault for the accident, even when evidence shows clear third-party negligence. They point to any safety rule the worker may have violated, suggest the worker was distracted or careless, or claim the worker was experienced enough to recognize and avoid the hazard. These arguments aim to reduce the defendant’s liability percentage under Arizona’s comparative negligence system, which reduces damages by the plaintiff’s fault percentage under A.R.S. § 12-2505.
Insurance carriers hire economists who use conservative assumptions to minimize lost earning calculations. They may ignore likely career advancement, use outdated wage data, or apply excessive discounts for present value calculation. They undervalue or ignore non-economic damages by suggesting the family will “move on” or that the deceased worker’s relationship with family members was not particularly close. Proper economic analysis and comprehensive presentation of the family’s actual relationship with the deceased produce substantially higher valuations.
Workplace fatal accidents frequently involve shared liability among multiple defendants, creating complex legal situations that require sophisticated handling. Each defendant typically has separate legal representation and insurance coverage, and their interests often conflict in ways that benefit the family’s claim.
Arizona applies joint and several liability principles in most wrongful death cases under A.R.S. § 12-2506, meaning each defendant found liable can be required to pay the entire judgment regardless of their percentage of fault. This rule protects families when one defendant lacks sufficient assets or insurance to pay their proportionate share. Defendants with greater insurance coverage or assets often settle for amounts exceeding their fault percentage to avoid joint and several liability at trial.
Joint and several liability applies fully when defendants act in concert or when their negligence is not reasonably divisible. Even when fault is apportioned among defendants, each remains jointly liable for economic damages, with several liability applying only to non-economic damages. This legal framework encourages settlement because defendants cannot escape liability simply by proving other parties were also at fault.
Defendants in multi-party workplace wrongful death cases typically blame each other for causing the accident, sometimes filing cross-claims seeking contribution or indemnification. General contractors blame subcontractors for unsafe work practices, subcontractors blame equipment manufacturers for defective products, and manufacturers blame property owners for improper use of equipment. These disputes benefit families by establishing that multiple parties recognize negligence occurred, even as they argue about who bears ultimate responsibility.
Defense attorney conflicts can create settlement advantages when defendants race to settle before trial to avoid joint and several liability or to preserve working relationships with other companies in their industry. A defendant who settles typically obtains a release from the family but remains potentially liable for contribution to non-settling defendants. This dynamic creates settlement pressure on remaining defendants who fear bearing disproportionate responsibility at trial.
No, Arizona’s workers’ compensation system provides immunity to employers for workplace injuries and deaths, preventing wrongful death lawsuits against employers except in extremely rare cases involving intentional harm. However, you can pursue wrongful death claims against third parties whose negligence contributed to the fatal accident, such as equipment manufacturers, property owners, general contractors if your family member worked for a subcontractor, maintenance contractors, or negligent drivers in transportation-related deaths. Your family can receive workers’ compensation death benefits from the employer’s insurance while simultaneously pursuing third-party wrongful death claims.
Settlement timelines vary significantly based on liability clarity, insurance coverage, and defendant cooperation, with some cases settling within six to twelve months while others require two to three years of litigation before resolution. Cases with clear third-party liability and adequate insurance coverage may settle during pre-litigation negotiations, while complex cases involving disputed liability or multiple defendants typically require filing a lawsuit and proceeding through discovery before meaningful settlement negotiations occur. Trial preparation and court scheduling add time, though most cases settle before trial as evidence develops and the certainty of jury deliberation approaches.
Filing a third-party wrongful death claim does not reduce or eliminate workers’ compensation death benefits your family receives, and both types of compensation can be pursued simultaneously. However, the workers’ compensation carrier that paid death benefits has a statutory lien on any settlement or judgment you recover from third-party defendants, meaning they can recover some of what they paid from your wrongful death settlement. Arizona law requires reducing the workers’ compensation lien by a proportionate share of attorney fees and costs, so you do not bear the full burden of reimbursement, and your net recovery from both sources combined typically far exceeds what workers’ compensation alone would provide.
Bankruptcy by a defendant complicates wrongful death claims but does not necessarily eliminate recovery, as bankruptcy courts often allow wrongful death claims to proceed and may establish funds for tort claimants separate from general creditors. Companies without insurance may still have assets that can satisfy judgments including real property, equipment, accounts receivable, or personal assets of individual owners in cases involving sole proprietorships or LLCs where corporate protections can be pierced. Multi-defendant cases provide protection because other liable parties with insurance or assets remain responsible under joint and several liability principles, and thorough investigation may identify additional defendants or insurance coverage not initially apparent, including umbrella policies, additional insured coverage, or successor corporations that assumed liability.
Yes, independent contractors killed in workplace accidents have families who can pursue full wrongful death claims against any party whose negligence caused the death, often with greater flexibility than employee families because independent contractor status may eliminate employer immunity issues. Independent contractors typically do not receive workers’ compensation benefits, so wrongful death claims against the hiring company, property owners, equipment manufacturers, or other negligent parties become the primary source of compensation. The legal analysis focuses on who owed duties to the independent contractor and whether those duties were breached, with premises liability and product liability principles frequently applying in these cases.
Non-economic damages for loss of companionship and emotional suffering have no mathematical formula, with juries determining appropriate amounts based on evidence of the family’s relationship with the deceased, testimony from family members and friends describing the deceased’s role in the family, the circumstances of death and whether the victim suffered before dying, and the long-term impact on each surviving family member’s life. Attorneys present evidence including family photographs, videos, testimony about daily activities and family traditions, expert testimony about the psychological impact of traumatic loss, and descriptions of the deceased’s relationship with their spouse and children including their involvement in parenting, household management, and emotional support. Arizona does not cap non-economic damages in workplace wrongful death cases, allowing juries to award amounts they deem appropriate based on the evidence presented.
Critical evidence includes OSHA investigation reports documenting safety violations, witness statements from co-workers who observed the accident or knew about hazardous conditions, photographs and measurements of the accident scene before cleanup or repairs, maintenance records showing equipment was not properly serviced, training records demonstrating the deceased or others received inadequate safety instruction, prior incident reports showing the defendant knew about similar hazards, and expert testimony from safety engineers, accident reconstructionists, or industry specialists explaining how the accident occurred and what safety measures would have prevented it. Physical evidence including failed equipment parts, defective products, or structural components that collapsed must be preserved immediately because defendants often repair or dispose of evidence quickly after accidents.
Yes, Arizona’s comparative negligence system under A.R.S. § 12-2505 allows recovery even when the deceased worker was partially at fault, with damages reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to the deceased. For example, if total damages are one million dollars and the deceased is found thirty percent at fault, your family would recover seven hundred thousand dollars from the defendants who bear the remaining seventy percent responsibility. This system recognizes that multiple parties’ negligence often contributes to workplace accidents and that families should not be entirely barred from recovery because of partial fault, especially when defendants’ safety violations created the hazardous conditions that led to the accident.
Losing a family member in a workplace accident creates immediate financial pressure and long-term emotional trauma that no legal claim can fully address. However, pursuing wrongful death compensation provides families with financial security and holds negligent parties accountable for preventable deaths. Time-sensitive deadlines and complex legal procedures make early consultation with experienced wrongful death counsel essential for protecting your family’s rights and maximizing available compensation.
Wrongful Death Trial Attorney LLC provides families throughout Tempe with compassionate legal representation focused on achieving maximum compensation while handling all legal complexities. Our firm investigates workplace fatal accidents thoroughly, identifies all sources of liability and insurance coverage, and aggressively pursues full damages for both economic losses and emotional suffering. We work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for your family. Contact Wrongful Death Trial Attorney LLC at (480) 420-0500 or complete our confidential online consultation form to speak with a dedicated Tempe workplace accident wrongful death lawyer about your family’s claim.