Peoria Construction Accident Wrongful Death Lawyer

Construction sites in Peoria are among the most dangerous work environments in Arizona, and when preventable accidents result in a worker’s death, families face devastating emotional and financial consequences. Arizona law allows certain family members to pursue wrongful death claims against parties whose negligence contributed to the fatal accident, including contractors, property owners, equipment manufacturers, and third parties whose actions violated safety standards. If your loved one died in a construction accident, understanding your legal rights and the claims process is essential to securing the compensation your family deserves during this difficult time.

Construction fatalities differ from typical workplace deaths because multiple parties beyond the employer may share liability, creating complex legal claims that require thorough investigation and experienced representation. Unlike standard workers’ compensation claims that limit recovery to specific benefits, wrongful death lawsuits allow families to pursue full compensation for lost financial support, loss of companionship, funeral expenses, and the pain their loved one endured before death. These cases demand attorneys who understand both construction site regulations and wrongful death law to identify all responsible parties and build compelling claims that hold them accountable.

At Wrongful Death Trial Attorney LLC, our Peoria construction accident wrongful death lawyers have helped numerous families secure justice after losing loved ones to preventable construction site tragedies. We conduct comprehensive investigations, work with industry experts to establish liability, and fight aggressively to maximize compensation while you focus on healing. Call (480) 420-0500 now for a free consultation, or complete our contact form to speak with an attorney who will evaluate your case and explain your legal options with clarity and compassion.

Understanding Construction Accident Wrongful Death Claims in Peoria

A construction accident wrongful death claim arises when a worker dies due to negligence, unsafe conditions, defective equipment, or regulatory violations at a construction site. These claims differ fundamentally from workers’ compensation benefits because they target third parties whose wrongful conduct caused the death, not the deceased worker’s direct employer. Arizona’s wrongful death statute, O.C.G.A. § 12-612, allows specific family members to recover damages that reflect both economic losses and the full value of the relationship destroyed by the death.

The foundation of these claims rests on proving that identifiable parties owed a duty of care to the deceased worker, breached that duty through negligent or reckless conduct, and directly caused the fatal injuries. Construction sites involve numerous entities including general contractors, subcontractors, property owners, equipment rental companies, and manufacturers, each with distinct safety obligations. When any party fails to meet industry standards or violates Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations, they may face wrongful death liability regardless of whether they directly employed the deceased worker.

Who Can File a Peoria Construction Accident Wrongful Death Claim

Arizona law establishes a strict hierarchy determining who holds the legal right to file wrongful death claims. Under Arizona Revised Statutes § 12-612, only certain family members can bring these lawsuits, and the order of priority matters significantly. Understanding this hierarchy ensures the appropriate family member files the claim within the legal timeframe and protects the family’s collective interests.

The surviving spouse holds the exclusive right to file during the first six months following the death. If no spouse exists or if the spouse fails to file within this initial period, adult children of the deceased gain the right to pursue the claim. When neither a spouse nor adult children exist, the deceased’s parents may file. This statutory scheme prevents conflicting claims while ensuring someone with a genuine interest in the deceased’s life has standing to seek justice and compensation.

Only one wrongful death lawsuit can proceed per death, meaning all eligible family members must coordinate their interests within a single legal action. An experienced Peoria construction accident wrongful death lawyer manages this coordination, ensuring every family member’s losses are documented and included in the damages calculation. This unified approach prevents insurance companies from exploiting family disagreements and maximizes the overall compensation recovered for the entire family unit.

Common Causes of Fatal Construction Accidents in Peoria

Construction site fatalities result from identifiable hazards that proper safety measures could prevent. Understanding the most frequent causes helps families recognize when negligence occurred and which parties should be held accountable. Each cause involves specific safety regulations that contractors and site operators must follow to protect workers’ lives.

Falls from Heights

Falls remain the leading cause of construction worker deaths nationwide and in Peoria specifically. Workers die falling from scaffolding, ladders, roofs, elevated platforms, and structural frames when employers fail to provide adequate fall protection systems. OSHA’s fall protection standards under 29 C.F.R. § 1926.501 require guardrails, safety nets, or personal fall arrest systems for work above six feet, yet many contractors cut corners or fail to properly train workers in equipment use.

Liability extends beyond the direct employer to include general contractors who control the worksite, scaffold companies that improperly erected platforms, and equipment rental firms that provided defective harnesses or anchors. When fall protection equipment exists but workers lack proper training in its use, both the employer and general contractor may share responsibility for failing to implement required safety programs.

Struck-By Accidents

Workers die when struck by falling objects, swinging loads, moving vehicles, or collapsing structures at construction sites. These accidents occur when contractors fail to establish proper exclusion zones, neglect to secure materials at height, operate equipment without proper spotters, or allow untrained personnel to operate machinery. OSHA’s struck-by standards require specific precautions including hard hat use, restricted access zones, and load securement protocols.

Third-party liability frequently emerges in struck-by fatalities because equipment operators, material suppliers, or crane companies often work as independent contractors rather than direct employees. When a subcontractor’s negligent operation of a crane or forklift kills a worker, the victim’s family can pursue wrongful death claims against both the operator’s employer and any general contractor who failed to supervise site operations properly.

Electrocutions

Contact with live electrical wires, improper grounding, defective tools, and work near overhead power lines cause fatal electrocutions at Peoria construction sites. Electrical contractors must follow National Electrical Code requirements and OSHA standards under 29 C.F.R. § 1926.400 that mandate proper grounding, circuit protection, and safe distances from power sources. Fatalities occur when these standards are ignored or when general contractors fail to coordinate utility locations before excavation begins.

Utility companies may face wrongful death liability if they failed to properly mark underground lines after receiving location requests, or if overhead power lines were not de-energized or properly insulated in active work zones. Equipment manufacturers can also be held responsible when defective tools lacking proper grounding or insulation contribute to fatal shocks.

Caught-In or Caught-Between Accidents

Workers die when caught in or crushed by equipment, collapsing trenches, or heavy machinery. Trench collapses kill workers when contractors fail to follow OSHA’s excavation standards under 29 C.F.R. § 1926.650, which require protective systems for trenches deeper than five feet. Similarly, workers become caught in unguarded machinery when equipment lacks required safety guards or when lockout/tagout procedures are not followed during maintenance.

These accidents often involve multiple liable parties. Equipment manufacturers face claims when missing or inadequate machine guards violate design standards. Rental companies may be liable for providing equipment with disabled safety features. General contractors and excavation subcontractors share responsibility when they fail to implement protective systems or ignore soil analysis showing collapse risks.

Parties Who May Be Liable in Construction Wrongful Death Cases

Construction sites involve complex networks of companies and individuals, each with specific safety responsibilities. Identifying all liable parties requires thorough investigation into contracts, safety violations, and the specific circumstances surrounding the fatal accident. Multiple parties often share responsibility, and pursuing all liable defendants maximizes compensation and ensures complete accountability.

General contractors typically control overall site safety and coordinate subcontractor activities. They face liability when they fail to implement site-wide safety programs, neglect to inspect subcontractor work for hazards, or create dangerous conditions through poor site management. Even when a subcontractor’s employee dies, general contractors may be liable if they exercised sufficient control over job site operations or failed to enforce safety requirements in their subcontracts.

Property owners can be held responsible when they maintain control over safety decisions, fail to warn contractors about known hazards, or create dangerous conditions through their own negligence. Arizona law recognizes that property owners who actively participate in construction operations or retain authority over safety protocols owe duties to workers on their property. This liability extends to developers and construction managers who exercise day-to-day control over projects even if they do not own the land.

Subcontractors face direct liability for deaths caused by their own negligent work or safety violations. Specialized trades including electrical contractors, plumbing companies, and excavation firms must follow industry-specific safety standards. When their work creates hazards that kill workers from other trades, they can be sued regardless of whether they employed the deceased worker directly.

Equipment manufacturers and rental companies face product liability claims when defective machinery, tools, or safety equipment contributes to worker deaths. This includes manufacturing defects that make equipment unsafe, design defects that create inherent dangers, and failure to provide adequate warnings about proper use. Rental companies must inspect and maintain equipment properly, and they face liability when they rent equipment with known defects or disabled safety features that contribute to fatal accidents.

Damages Available in Peoria Construction Wrongful Death Claims

Arizona’s wrongful death statute allows families to recover comprehensive damages that reflect both economic losses and the intangible value of the relationship destroyed by the death. These damages far exceed the limited benefits available through workers’ compensation, making wrongful death claims essential for families facing financial devastation after losing their primary income earner.

Economic damages compensate for measurable financial losses including the present value of lost wages, salary, benefits, and bonuses the deceased would have earned over their expected working life. Calculations account for the deceased’s age, occupation, education, health, and career trajectory, often requiring expert economists to project lifetime earning capacity accurately. Families also recover medical expenses incurred before death, funeral and burial costs, and the value of household services the deceased provided.

Non-economic damages address losses that lack precise dollar values but profoundly impact surviving family members. These include loss of companionship, guidance, protection, and affection that spouses and children will never experience again. Arizona law recognizes the devastating emotional harm caused by wrongful death and allows juries to award substantial compensation reflecting the unique value of each relationship severed by the defendant’s negligence.

In cases involving extreme negligence or intentional misconduct, Arizona law permits punitive damages under A.R.S. § 12-613. These damages punish defendants and deter similar conduct, potentially multiplying total compensation significantly. Punitive damages require clear and convincing evidence that defendants acted with conscious disregard for worker safety or intentionally violated known safety standards. When contractors repeatedly ignore OSHA citations or deliberately remove safety equipment to speed production, punitive damages become viable and can dramatically increase total recovery.

The Wrongful Death Claims Process After a Construction Accident

Pursuing justice after a construction accident death involves multiple stages, each requiring strategic decisions and thorough preparation. Understanding this process helps families know what to expect and how to protect their rights at each critical juncture.

Immediate Investigation and Evidence Preservation

The hours and days immediately following a fatal construction accident are critical for preserving evidence before it disappears or is destroyed. Attorneys must act quickly to secure the accident site, photograph conditions, interview witnesses while memories remain fresh, and obtain all relevant documents including safety records, training logs, and inspection reports. OSHA will conduct its own investigation, but families need independent investigations that serve their legal interests rather than regulatory purposes.

This phase includes identifying all parties with potential liability and understanding the contractual relationships between them. Attorney investigators review site safety plans, subcontractor agreements, equipment rental contracts, and insurance policies to map the full scope of responsible parties. Early investigation also identifies expert witnesses including engineers, safety consultants, and industry specialists who can analyze what went wrong and who failed to meet required safety standards.

Filing the Wrongful Death Claim

Once investigation establishes liability, attorneys file the wrongful death lawsuit in Maricopa County Superior Court. Arizona’s statute of limitations under A.R.S. § 12-542 provides two years from the date of death to file, though exceptions may extend or shorten this deadline in specific situations. Filing initiates formal legal proceedings and forces defendants to respond to specific allegations about their negligent conduct.

The complaint must name all liable parties, describe how each defendant’s negligence contributed to the death, and specify the damages sought. Strategic decisions about which parties to sue and what claims to assert can significantly impact the case’s outcome. Experienced attorneys ensure complaints are comprehensive yet focused, establishing clear legal theories that evidence will support throughout litigation.

Discovery and Depositions

After defendants answer the complaint, both sides exchange evidence through the discovery process. This includes written questions (interrogatories), document requests, and depositions where attorneys question witnesses under oath. Discovery in construction wrongful death cases is extensive, often involving thousands of pages of safety records, training materials, inspection reports, accident reports, prior OSHA citations, and personnel files.

Depositions provide opportunities to lock defendants into specific testimony before trial, identify weaknesses in their defenses, and gather admissions that support liability claims. Attorneys depose site supervisors, safety managers, equipment operators, coworkers who witnessed the accident, and corporate representatives who can explain company safety policies. Expert depositions allow attorneys to challenge opposing experts’ opinions and refine their own experts’ testimony for maximum impact at trial.

Settlement Negotiations

Most wrongful death cases resolve through settlement rather than trial, often after discovery reveals the strength of the family’s case. Settlement negotiations may occur through direct discussions between attorneys, formal mediation sessions with a neutral third party, or informal conferences with the judge overseeing the case. Defendants evaluate settlement offers based on liability strength, available insurance coverage, and the risk of punitive damages if the case proceeds to trial.

Families should understand that insurance companies initially offer far less than cases are worth, hoping financial pressure will force quick settlements. Experienced attorneys counter these tactics by thoroughly documenting all damages, presenting compelling evidence of liability, and demonstrating readiness to try the case if necessary. Settlement negotiations intensify as trial approaches because defendants recognize that juries in construction death cases often award substantial verdicts when evidence shows preventable tragedies caused by corporate negligence.

How OSHA Violations Strengthen Wrongful Death Claims

OSHA establishes comprehensive safety standards for construction sites under 29 C.F.R. Part 1926, and violations of these standards provide powerful evidence of negligence in wrongful death lawsuits. When OSHA investigates a fatal construction accident and issues citations, those citations become critical proof that defendants failed to meet required safety standards. Arizona courts recognize OSHA violations as evidence of negligence, though violations alone do not automatically establish liability in civil lawsuits.

OSHA citations describe specific safety violations, classify them by severity (willful, serious, or other-than-serious), and propose penalties. Willful violations occur when employers knowingly disregard safety requirements or act with plain indifference to worker safety. These citations provide the strongest evidence for wrongful death claims and support punitive damages arguments because they demonstrate conscious disregard for safety. Serious violations exist when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from conditions that the employer knew or should have known about.

OSHA’s investigation files contain valuable evidence including witness statements, photographs, measurements, and expert analysis that families can obtain through Freedom of Information Act requests. This evidence supplements independent investigations and provides government-backed documentation of how the accident occurred and which safety standards were violated. Attorneys use OSHA findings to support expert opinions, cross-examine defendants who deny knowledge of hazards, and demonstrate to juries that independent government investigators reached the same conclusions about fault.

The Role of Workers’ Compensation in Construction Death Cases

Workers’ compensation provides death benefits to families when work-related accidents kill employees, but these benefits are significantly limited compared to wrongful death damages. Understanding how workers’ compensation interacts with wrongful death claims is essential because families may pursue both remedies simultaneously when third parties bear responsibility for the death.

Workers’ compensation death benefits under Arizona law include burial expenses up to statutory limits, weekly payments to dependents equal to two-thirds of the deceased worker’s average wages, and potential educational benefits for dependent children. These benefits are paid by the deceased worker’s direct employer’s workers’ compensation insurance and do not require proving negligence. The trade-off is that families cannot sue the direct employer for wrongful death regardless of how negligent that employer was.

The exclusive remedy rule that bars wrongful death suits against direct employers does not protect third parties whose negligence contributed to the death. This creates opportunities to pursue wrongful death claims against general contractors, property owners, equipment manufacturers, and other parties not considered the deceased worker’s direct employer. These third-party wrongful death claims can recover full damages including pain and suffering, loss of companionship, and punitive damages that workers’ compensation never provides.

Families may receive both workers’ compensation benefits and wrongful death damages from third parties, though Arizona law allows defendants to reduce wrongful death awards by certain workers’ compensation benefits already paid. Strategic coordination between workers’ compensation claims and wrongful death lawsuits maximizes total family recovery while avoiding legal pitfalls that could jeopardize either claim.

Investigating Complex Liability in Multi-Party Construction Cases

Construction sites operate through complex webs of contracts, subcontracts, and insurance policies that spread responsibility across numerous entities. Determining who bears legal liability requires analyzing these relationships carefully and understanding how Arizona law assigns duties among different parties. Effective investigation uncovers all potential defendants and identifies insurance policies that will fund compensation.

General contractors typically enter contracts with property owners and then subcontract specific work to specialty trades. These subcontracts often include indemnification clauses requiring subcontractors to assume liability for accidents and name general contractors as additional insureds on liability policies. However, Arizona law limits enforcement of these clauses under A.R.S. § 34-226, which prohibits indemnification for a party’s own negligence in construction contracts. Attorneys must review all contracts to understand how parties allocated risk and which insurance policies apply to the claim.

Joint venture relationships create shared liability when multiple contractors work together on projects. When contractors form joint ventures, each member may be liable for the negligence of others in the venture. Similarly, when general contractors exercise sufficient control over subcontractor work, they may face liability for that subcontractor’s safety violations even without direct employment relationships. Courts examine the degree of control, site supervision, and safety oversight to determine whether general contractors can be held responsible for subcontractor negligence.

Dealing with Insurance Companies After a Fatal Construction Accident

Insurance companies representing liable parties focus on minimizing payouts rather than fairly compensating grieving families. Understanding their tactics helps families avoid mistakes that could reduce compensation or jeopardize their claims entirely. Insurance adjusters are trained negotiators working for corporations whose profits increase when they pay less to injury victims and surviving families.

Early contact from insurance adjusters often seems helpful and sympathetic, but families should never provide recorded statements or sign documents without attorney guidance. Adjusters use recorded statements to gather information they will later use against families, highlighting any inconsistencies or admissions that weaken claims. They may ask leading questions designed to elicit statements suggesting the deceased worker was partially at fault or that safety equipment was available but not used.

Settlement offers made shortly after deaths almost always undervalue cases significantly. Insurance companies know that families face immediate financial pressure from funeral expenses and lost income, and they exploit this vulnerability by presenting lowball offers with artificial deadlines. These early offers rarely account for the full value of lifetime lost earnings, the depth of emotional loss, or the potential for punitive damages. Families who accept these offers forfeit their rights to pursue additional compensation even after discovering the true extent of their losses.

Proving Negligence in Construction Wrongful Death Cases

Successful wrongful death claims require proving four essential elements: duty, breach, causation, and damages. Each element requires specific evidence, and failure to prove any one element defeats the entire claim. Understanding what evidence establishes each element helps families recognize the thorough investigation and expert analysis that construction death cases demand.

Duty exists when defendants owed legal obligations to protect the deceased worker from foreseeable harm. General contractors owe duties to maintain safe worksites for all workers regardless of who directly employs them. Property owners who retain control over construction activities or create dangerous conditions owe duties to workers. Equipment manufacturers owe duties to design safe products and warn of dangers. Establishing duty requires understanding the specific legal relationship between each defendant and the deceased worker.

Breach occurs when defendants fail to meet the standard of care that reasonable parties in their positions would exercise. This includes violating OSHA standards, ignoring industry safety practices, failing to provide required safety equipment, inadequately training workers, or disregarding known hazards. Expert witnesses establish what reasonable contractors, property owners, or manufacturers would have done in similar circumstances, then explain how defendants’ conduct fell short of these standards.

Causation links defendants’ negligent conduct directly to the death. Plaintiffs must prove both that the negligence was a cause-in-fact of the death (the death would not have occurred without the negligence) and that the death was a foreseeable result of the negligence. This often requires accident reconstruction experts who analyze physical evidence, witness statements, and site conditions to explain precisely how the accident occurred and why proper safety measures would have prevented it.

The Importance of Expert Witnesses in Construction Death Claims

Complex construction wrongful death cases require testimony from qualified experts who can explain technical concepts to juries and establish standards of care that defendants violated. Courts allow expert testimony when specialized knowledge will assist juries in understanding evidence or determining facts, making experts essential in cases involving construction safety, engineering, and medical causation.

Safety experts and industrial hygienists testify about construction site safety standards, OSHA requirements, and industry best practices. These experts review accident scenes, analyze evidence, and explain what safety measures defendants should have implemented to prevent the death. They identify specific violations, explain why each violation was dangerous, and describe how proper safety protocols would have saved the deceased worker’s life. Their testimony establishes the standard of care and proves defendants breached it.

Engineers and accident reconstruction specialists analyze physical evidence to determine exactly how accidents occurred. They examine failed equipment, inspect accident sites, review photographs and videos, and apply physics principles to recreate events leading to death. These experts produce reports and demonstrative exhibits that help juries visualize accidents and understand complex mechanical failures or structural collapses that laypeople might not grasp from verbal descriptions alone.

Economic experts calculate the financial value of lost lifetime earnings, benefits, and household services. They analyze the deceased worker’s employment history, education, career trajectory, and life expectancy to project what the worker would have earned over a full career. These calculations provide concrete dollar figures for economic damages and counter defense arguments that families’ losses are minimal. Their testimony is especially powerful in cases involving young workers with decades of earning potential ahead of them.

Medical experts may testify about the deceased worker’s injuries, cause of death, and whether the worker experienced conscious pain and suffering before dying. When defendants contest causation or suggest pre-existing conditions contributed to death, medical experts review autopsy reports, medical records, and toxicology results to establish that trauma from the accident was the sole cause. Their testimony also supports claims for pain and suffering damages by explaining how long the worker remained conscious after the fatal injury occurred.

Time Limits for Filing Construction Wrongful Death Lawsuits

Arizona law imposes strict deadlines called statutes of limitations that determine how long families have to file wrongful death lawsuits. Under A.R.S. § 12-542, wrongful death claims must be filed within two years from the date of death. Missing this deadline typically bars families from recovering any compensation regardless of how strong their case is or how egregious the defendants’ conduct was.

The two-year period begins on the date of death, not the date of the accident. When workers are injured in construction accidents but survive for days, weeks, or months before dying from their injuries, the statute of limitations starts when death occurs. This distinction matters in cases where injuries initially seemed survivable but later proved fatal due to complications or secondary injuries.

Certain circumstances can extend or shorten limitation periods. If defendants fraudulently concealed their wrongdoing or if families could not reasonably discover the negligence that caused death, courts may apply discovery rules that delay the limitations period. Conversely, government entities involved in construction projects may require claim notices within much shorter timeframes before lawsuits can proceed. These complexities make early attorney consultation essential to preserve all legal rights.

Why Families Need Experienced Wrongful Death Attorneys

Construction wrongful death cases involve multiple areas of law including premises liability, products liability, OSHA regulations, workers’ compensation, and complex insurance coverage issues. Successfully navigating this legal landscape requires attorneys with specific experience in construction accident cases who understand both liability theories and practical realities of construction site operations.

Experienced attorneys know how to identify all liable parties and available insurance coverage. They understand that general contractors may be vicariously liable for subcontractor negligence, that equipment rental companies face strict liability for defective equipment, and that property owners may be liable despite not directly employing the deceased worker. They also know how to find umbrella policies and excess coverage that defendants often hide to minimize apparent available compensation.

Thorough investigation distinguishes successful claims from failed ones. Attorneys with construction accident experience know what evidence to gather, which experts to retain, and how to analyze site conditions, equipment maintenance records, and safety training documents. They act quickly before evidence disappears, witnesses forget details, or defendants destroy documents. This proactive approach builds strong cases that force favorable settlements or win at trial.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sue if my loved one’s employer caused the construction accident?

Arizona’s workers’ compensation system generally prevents wrongful death lawsuits against the deceased worker’s direct employer, but families can pursue claims against third parties whose negligence contributed to the death, including general contractors, subcontractors, property owners, and equipment manufacturers not considered direct employers.

How long does a construction wrongful death lawsuit typically take?

Most construction wrongful death cases resolve within 12 to 24 months through settlement negotiations, though complex cases involving multiple defendants or disputed liability may take three years or longer, especially if they proceed to trial and appeals.

What if my loved one was partially at fault for the accident?

Arizona follows pure comparative negligence under A.R.S. § 12-2505, meaning families can recover damages even if the deceased worker was partially at fault, though total damages are reduced by the deceased worker’s percentage of fault as determined by the jury.

Will I have to testify or go to court?

Surviving family members typically provide depositions during discovery where they answer questions about their relationship with the deceased and financial losses, and they may testify at trial about damages, though many cases settle before trial, eliminating the need for courtroom testimony.

How much is a construction wrongful death case worth?

Case values vary significantly based on the deceased worker’s age, earnings, family circumstances, degree of defendant negligence, and available insurance coverage, with settlements and verdicts ranging from hundreds of thousands to multiple millions of dollars depending on these factors.

Can I still file a claim if OSHA did not cite any violations?

Yes, families can pursue wrongful death claims regardless of whether OSHA issued citations because civil wrongful death standards differ from OSHA’s regulatory enforcement criteria, and negligence can exist even when specific regulatory violations are not identified.

Contact a Peoria Construction Accident Wrongful Death Lawyer Today

Losing a loved one to a preventable construction accident leaves families facing emotional devastation and financial uncertainty simultaneously. Arizona law provides a limited window to pursue justice and compensation, making immediate action essential to protect your rights. The decisions you make in the coming weeks will significantly impact your family’s financial security and ability to hold negligent parties accountable for the tragedy they caused. An experienced Peoria construction accident wrongful death lawyer at Wrongful Death Trial Attorney LLC will guide you through this complex legal process with compassion and determination, conducting thorough investigations, identifying all liable parties, and fighting tirelessly to maximize the compensation your family deserves.

Call (480) 420-0500 now for a free, confidential consultation where we will evaluate your case, explain your legal options, and outline the steps necessary to pursue full compensation. You can also complete our online contact form to schedule a meeting at a time that works for your family. We handle wrongful death cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for your family, eliminating financial barriers to experienced legal representation when you need it most.